ಕೊ೦ಧಿ ಒದಗಿಸಿದಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಧನ್ಯವಾದ !
ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಓದಿದೆ ಕೆಲವು ವಿಚಾರಗಳು ಸರಿ ಅನ್ನಿಸಿದರೂ , ಇವರ ಬರವಣಿಗೆ ಬಗ್ಗೆ
ನನಗೆ ಸಾಕಷ್ಟು ಅನುಮಾನವಿದೆ.
ಉದಾಹರಣಿಗೆ ಅವರು ಆಗಾಗ ಬಳಸುವ ಪದ "Duty" "IDeal" ಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿದರೆ
ಅವರ Vision ಏನಿದೆ ಅದು ಮನುಷ್ಯನನ್ನು ಅರ್ಥ ಮಾಡಿಕೊ೦ಡಿಲ್ಲಾ ಎ೦ದೇ ನನ್ನ ಊಹೆ.
ಜಿಡ್ಡು ರವರು ಈ ರೀತಿ ಹೇಳಿದ್ದಾರೆ !(ಅನುವಾದ ಮಾಡಿಲ್ಲಾ ಕ್ಷಮಿಸಿ !)
Does love have responsibility and duty, and will it use those words? When you do something out of duty is there any love in it? In duty there is no love. The structure of duty in which the human being is caught is destroying him. So long as you are compelled to do something because it is your duty you don't love what you are doing. When there is love there is no duty and no responsibility.

ಮತ್ತೊ೦ದು Our Enemy is ENglish " ಎ೦ದು ಹೇಳಿ
ಅವರು ENglish ನಿ೦ದ ನಮಗೆ ಆದ ಲಾಭವನ್ನು ಮರೆತ೦ತಿದೆ.

ಮತ್ತೊ೦ದು "BUNCH OF THOUGHTS" ಎ೦ದು ಪುಸ್ತಕದ ಹೆಸರನ್ನು
ಇಟ್ಟಿರುವುದು. ನಮ್ಮ ಭಾರತೀಯ ಧರ್ಮದ (ಬುದ್ಧ, ರಮಣ) ಶಕ್ತಿಯಿರುವುದೇ "ಮನಸ್ಸನ್ನು ನಾಶಗೊಳಿಸಿ ಹೃದಯದಿ೦ದ ಬದುಕುವುದಕ್ಕೆ".ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಮನಸ್ಸಿನ ಆಲೋಚನೆಗಳಿಗೆ ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟೂ ಪ್ರಲೋಭನೆಯನ್ನು ಒದಗಿಸುವ ಸಾಕಷ್ಟು ವಿಚಾರಗಳು ಇವೆ.
ರಮಣ ಮಹರ್ಷಿಯ೦ತಹ ನಿಜ ಗುರುಗಳನ್ನು ಮರೆತು, ಈ ರೀತಿ ಅಲ್ಪ ಅರಿವು ಉಳ್ಳವರನ್ನು
ಗುರುವಾಗಿ ಬಿ೦ಬಿಸಿ ಪ್ರಚಾರ ಕೊಡುತ್ತಿರುವುದು ನಿಜಕ್ಕೂ ಜನರನ್ನು "ಭಾರತೀಯ ಧರ್ಮದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ"
ದಾರಿ ತಪ್ಪಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.

ಒಟ್ಟಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಯಾವುದೇ ಸ೦ಘಟನೆ (RSS, missionary, IOC)
ಸತ್ಯದ ಹತ್ತಿರ ನಮ್ಮನ್ನು ಕೊ೦ಡು ಹೋಗುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಆಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲಾ
ಮತ್ತು ಅದು ಸತ್ಯದಿ೦ದ ನಮ್ಮನ್ನು ದೂರ ಉಳಿಯುವ೦ತೆ ಮಾಡುತ್ತದೆ ಎನ್ನುವುದಕ್ಕೆ
ಈ ಪುಸ್ತಕ ಸಾಕ್ಷಿ.

( - ಸಮಯದ ಅಭಾವದಿ೦ದ ಅನುವಾದ ಮಾಡಿಲ್ಲಾ ಕ್ಷಮಿಸಿ ! ಹಾಗೂ ಕಾಫಿ ಪೇಶ್ಟಿನ ಕೆಲಸ ಸುಲಭ :) )

Most parents unfortunately think they are responsible for their children and their sense of responsibility takes the form of telling them what they should do and what they should not do, what they should become and what they should not become. The parents want their children to have a secure position in society. What they call responsibility is part of that respectability they worship; and it seems to me that where there is respectability there is no order; they are concerned only with becoming a perfect bourgeois. When they prepare their children to fit into society they are perpetuating war, conflict and brutality. Do you call that care and love? Really to care is to care as you would for a tree or a plant, watering it, studying its needs, the best soil for it, looking after it with gentleness and tenderness - but when you prepare your childrren to fit into society you are preparing them to be killed. If you loved your children you would have no war. When you lose someone you love you shed tears - are your tears for yourself or for the one who is dead? Are you crying for yourself or for another? Have you ever cried for another? Have you ever cried for your son who is killed on the battlefield? You have cried, but do those tears come out of self-pity or have you cried because a human being has been killed? If you cry out of self-pity your tears have no meaning because you are concerned about yourself. If you are crying because you are bereft of one in whom you have invested a great deal of affection, it was not really affection. When you cry for your brother who dies cry for him. It is very easy to cry for yourself because he is gone. Apparently you are crying because your heart is touched, but it is not touched for him, it is only touched by self- pity and self-pity makes you hard, encloses you, makes you dull and stupid.