ಬರಲಿರುವ ನನ್ನ ಸಂಪಾದಿತ 'ಹಿಂದೂ' ಹಾಗೆಂದರೇನು. . . . ? ಕೃತಿಯಲ್ಲಿನ ವಾದಗಳ ಒಂದು ನೋಟ,

ಸೋನಿಯಾರಿ (ರಾಜಕಾರಣಿ)ಗೂ ನಿಮ (ಸಂಶೋಧಕ)ಗೂ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸವಿಲ್ಲವೇ ಕಿರಣ್???, ಮೇಲೆ ನೀವೇ ಮಾಡಿದ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖದ ಸಾಲು ಇದು
<<<ಯಾವತ್ತು ಓದಿನಿಂದ ಬಂದ ಆಲೋಚನೆಯೇ ಜ್ಞಾನವಲ್ಲ,(ಬಹಳ ಜನ ಹಾಗೆ ಭಾವಿಸುತ್ತಾರೆ) ಅ ಜ್ಞಾನ ನಮ್ಮ ಅನುಭವವನ್ನು ಪ್ರತಿನಿಧಿಸಬೇಕು>>>
ಆದರೆ ತಮ್ಮ ವಿಮರ್ಶೆ ಇದಕ್ಕೆ ತದ್ವಿರುದ್ದವಾಗಿದೆ. ಆರ್.ಎಸ್.ಎಸ್. ಕುರಿತ ಯಾವ್ಯಾವುದೋ ಗುಂಪಿನ ನಿಲುವುಗಳಿಗೆ ನೀವೇಕೆ ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಧ್ವನಿ ನೀಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದೀರಿ? ಬೇರೆ ಬೇರೆ ಗುಂಪುಗಳ ನಿಲುವುಗಳನ್ನು ಉಲ್ಲೇಖಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೇ ಅದೇ ವಿಮರ್ಶೆಯೇ? ಸಾಧ್ಯವಾದಷ್ಟು ನಿಮ್ಮ ನಿಲುವು ಮತ್ತು ವಿವರಣೆ ನಿಖರ ಮತ್ತು ನಿರ್ಧಿಷ್ಟವಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಚಿಂತನೆಯ ಆಳ- ಅಗಲಗಳ ಪರಿಚಯ ಮತ್ತು ಅದರ ಮೇಲೆ ಉತ್ತಮ ಚರ್ಚೆ ಆಗಬಹುದೇನೋ. ಈ ಪುಸ್ತಕದಲ್ಲಿ ನನ್ನದೂ ಒಂದು ಲೇಖನವಿರುವುದರಿಂದ ಈ ಪುಸ್ತಕದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಬಿಡುಗಡೆಗೆ ಮುನ್ನವೇ ಇಲ್ಲದ ಗುಮಾನಿ ಹುಟ್ಟುವುದು ಬೇಡ ಎಂಬ ಕಾರಣಕ್ಕೆ ನನ್ನ ಈ ಕೋರಿಕೆ.
ಷಣ್ಮುಖ

"ಇಂದು ಸೋನಿಯಾ ಅವರು RSS ಅನ್ನು ಭಯೋತ್ಪಾದಕ ಸಂಘಟನೆ ಎನ್ನುವ ಅರ್ಥದಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾತನಾಡಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ಅವರದೇ ಅದ ಆಧಾರಗಲಿರುತ್ತವೆ ಅಲ್ಲವೇ"

ಸಾರ್, ಸೋನಿಯ ಮೌತ್ ಕಾ ಸೌದಾಗರ್ ಅಂದಾಗಲೂ ಆಧಾರ ಇತ್ತು ಅಂತೀರ? ಒಬ್ಬ ರಾಜಕಾರಣಿ, ಅದು ಇನ್ನೊಬ್ಬರು ಬರೆದುಕೊಡುವ ಭಾಷಣ ಓದುವ ವಿದೇಶಿ ಮಹಿಳೆಯನ್ನು ತಾವು ಉದಾಹರಣೆಗೆ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವುದಾದರೆ, ಇದೇ ವೇದಿಕೆಯಲ್ಲೆ ಆಧರವಿಲ್ಲದೆಯೆ ಆಧಾರಸಹಿತ ವಾದಿಸುವವರು ಕೆಲವರು ಸಿಕುತ್ತಾರೆ, ಕಡೆ ಪಕ್ಷ ಅವರನ್ನ ಉದಾಹರಣೆಗೆ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಂಡರೆ ಒಳಿತಲ್ಲವೆ....

ಇನ್ನು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಲೇಖನ ಮತ್ತು ವಾದ ಸರಣಿ ಮುಂದುವರೆದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ.. ತಾವು ಲೇಖನದ ಮೊದಲಲ್ಲಿ ತಾವು ಇದನ್ನು ವಿಮರ್ಶಾತ್ಮಕ ಲೇಖನ ಎಂದು ಹೇಳಿಲ್ಲ ಅಥವಾ RSS ಬಗ್ಗೆ ತಾವು ಏನು ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದೀರಿ ಅನ್ನುವುದನ್ನೂ ಹೇಳೀಲ್ಲ. ಬದಲಿಗೆ "ಭಾರತದ 80 ವರ್ಷಗಳ ಇತಿಹಾಸದಲ್ಲೇ 'ದೇಶಭಕ್ತರು' ಎಂಬ ಪಟ್ಟವನ್ನು ಆರೆಸ್ಸೆಸ್ ಯಾರಿಗೂ ಬಿಟ್ಟುಕೊಟ್ಟಿಲ್ಲ. ದೇಶ, ದೇಶಪ್ರೇಮ ಎಂಬ ಪರಿಭಾಷೆಗೆ ಏನೇ ಸೈದ್ಧಾಂತಿಕ ವಿಶ್ಲೇಷಣೆ ಕೊಟ್ಟರೂ, ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ಜನರ ಕಣ್ಣಲ್ಲಿ ಆರೆಸ್ಸೆಸ್ ರೂಢಿಸಿರುವ 'ಪರದೇಶ ವಿರೋಧಿ' ಭಾರತ ಪ್ರೇಮ ಆಳವಾಗಿ ಬೇರುಬಿಟ್ಟಿದೆ." ಅನ್ನುವ ನೇರ ಆರೋಪ ಹೊರೆಸಿದ್ದೀರಿ ಅಲ್ಲವೆ? ಆನಂತರ ಚರ್ಚೆ ಎಲ್ಲೆಲ್ಲೊ ಸಾಗಿ ಬೇರೆ ಎಲ್ಲಿಂದಲೂ ಸರಕು ತಂದು ತಪ್ಪು ದಾರಿಗೆ ಎಳೆಯುವ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನ ನಡೆದಿದೆ ಅನ್ನಿಸುತ್ತಿಲ್ಲವೆ?

ಕಿರಣ್,

ನಿಮಗೆ ಬೇಕಾದ ವರ್ಗದವರ ಮಾತುಗಳನ್ನಷ್ಟೇ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಂಡು, ಬೇಡವಾದದ್ದನ್ನು ಬಿಟ್ಟರೆ, ಅದು ವಿಮರ್ಶೆ ಹೇಗಾದೀತು?
RSS ಕುರಿತಾಗಿ ಮಹಾತ್ಮಾ ಗಾಂಧಿ, ಡಾ|| ಅಂಬೇಡ್ಕರ್, ಡಾ|| ಎ.ಪಿ.ಜೆ. ಅಬ್ದುಲ್ ಕಲಂ, ಸರ್ದಾರ್ ಪಟೇಲ್, ಡಾ|| ಜಾಕಿರ್ ಹುಸೇನ್, ಜಯಪ್ರಕಾಶ್ ನಾರಾಯಣ್, ಸರ್ದಾರ್ ಖುಶ್ವಂತ್ ಸಿಂಗ್, ಮುಂತಾದವರು ಏನು ಹೇಳಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ಸಹ ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಿರುವಿರೇ? ಅಥವಾ ಇವರ ಮಾತುಗಳಿಗೆ ಬೆಲೆ ಇಲ್ಲವೇ?

ಅವರುಗಳು ಏನು ಹೇಳಿದ್ದಾರೆಂಬುದನ್ನು ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆಳಗೆ ಸೇರಿಸುವೆ (ನನ್ನ ಆಧಾರಗಳು ಆಂಗ್ಲ ಭಾಷೆಯಲ್ಲಿರುವುದರಿಂದ, ಅವನ್ನು ಅದೇ ರೀತಿ ನೀಡುತ್ತಿರುವೆ - ಕ್ಷಮೆ ಇರಲಿ):

WHAT THEY SAID

When I visited the RSS camp, I was very much impressed by your discipline and the complete absence of untouchability.
- Mahatma Gandhi at the RSS rally, Delhi 16.9.1947

In the Congress those who are in power feel that by virtue of authority they will be able to crush the R.S.S. By "danda" you cannot suppress an organization. Moreover "danda" is meant for thieves and "dakus". Using of "danda" will not help much. After all, R.S.S. men are not thieves and dacoits. They are patriots. They love their country.
- Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel in a public meeting, Lucknow 6.1.1948

I am surprised to find the Swayamsevaks moving about in absolute equality and brotherhood without even caring to know the caste of the others.
- Babasaheb Ambedkar at Pune Camp, May 1939

The allegations against RSS of violence and hatred against Muslims are wholly false. Muslims should learn the lesson of mutual love, co-operation and organization from RSS.
- Dr. Zakir Hussain

Yours is a revolutionary organization in the forefront of social transformation taking place today. You alone have the capacity to end casteism and wipe the tears from the eyes of the poor.
- Jayaprakash Narayan at RSS public function, Patna 3.11.1977

The name of RSS is a household word for selfless service all over the country.

- Koka Subba Rao, Rtd. Chief Justice of Bharat, 25.8.1968

RSS has played an honourable role in maintaining Hindu-Sikh unity before and after the murder of Indira Gandhi in Punjab, Delhi and other places.

- Sardar Khushwant Singh in Sunday Column

These days it is a fashion amongst the Congress and other secular leaders to speak ill about the RSS and the Sangh Parivar. They accuse the RSS of preaching hatred, creating communal tension and dividing the society on the basis of caste and of killing Mahatma Gandhi. Some of them have even called the RSS a snake which should be killed and not fed with milk.

Before spewing venom against one of the most respected organizations in India, these secular leaders should have a deeper perspective of our history. They must know that the court of law had categorically stated in the Mahatma Gandhi murder case that it was the act of an individual and that no organization was associated with it. They must know how their own idols and icons had come to respect the RSS and had praised it.

In 1934, when Gandhiji visited a 1500-strong Swayamsevaks camp at Wardha, he was pleasantly surprised to find that the Swayamsevaks were not even aware of the castes of one another, not to speak of any ideas of untouchability. The visit had left such a deep impression on Gandhiji’s mind that he referred to it full thirteen years later. In his address to the workers of Sangh in Bhangi Colony at Delhi on 16th September 1947, he said, “I visited the RSS camp years ago, when the founder Shri Hedgewar was alive. I was very much impressed by your discipline, the complete absence of untouchability and the rigorous simplicity. Since then the Sangh has grown. I am convinced that any organization which is inspired by the high ideal of service and self-sacrifice is bound to grow in strength.” (The Hindu: 17th September 1947)

When Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar visited Sangh Shiksha Varga in Pune in 1939, he was surprised to find the Swayamsevaks moving about in absolute equality and brotherhood without even caring to know the caste of the others. When Dr. Ambedkar asked Dr. Hedgewar whether there were any untouchables in the camp, the latter replied that there were neither touchables nor untouchables, but only Hindus.

After partition, when the Maharaja of Kashmir was harbouring the idea of retaining Kashmir as an independent kingdom, it was Guru Golwalkar of the RSS whom Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel had sent to convince the Maharaja to join India. Shri Guruji flew to Srinagar on 17th October 1947. After discussions with Shri Guruji, the Maharaja finally expressed his readiness to sign the Instrument of Accession to Bharat. Shri Guruji returned to New Delhi on 19th October, and reported to Sardar Patel about the Maharaja’s readiness to accede to Bharat.

After partition, Delhi was in the throes of violence and intrigues by the Muslim Leaguers. When later on Dr. Bhagwan Das, the great savant and a recipient of the Bharat Ratna award, came to know the details of the role of RSS in those crucial days, he wrote on 16th October 1948:

"I have been reliably informed that a number of youths of RSS were able to inform Sardar Patel and Nehruji in the very nick of time of the Leaguer`s intended coup on September 10, 1947, whereby they had planned to assassinate all members of Government and all Hindu officials and thousands of Hindu citizens on that day and plant the flag of Pakistan on the Red Fort and then seize all Hindusthan."

He added:
"Why have I said all this? Because if those high-spirited and self-sacrificing boys had not given the very timely information to Nehruji and Patelji, there would have been no Government of India today, the whole country would have changed its name into `Pakistan`, tens of millions of Hindus would have been slaughtered and all the rest converted to Islam or reduced to stark slavery. Well, what is the net result of all this long story? Simply this - that our Government should utilise, and not sterlise, the patriotic energies of the lakhs of RSS youths."

During the China war in 1962, the Swayamsevaks of the RSS swung into action mobilising support to the governmental measures in general and to the jawans in particular. Pandit Nehru was so impressed that he invited a Sangh contingent to take part in the Republic Day Parade of 26th January 1963. At a mere two days’ notice, over 3000 Swayamsevaks turned up at the parade in full Sangh uniform. Their massive march became the major highlight of the programme. When, later on, some Congressmen raised their eyebrows over the invitation to Sangh, Pandit Nehru brushed aside the objections saying that all patriotic citizens had been invited to join the parade.